Fluid
Identification in Complex Carbonate Reservoir: An Example from
Frass, Manfred1, Efrain Mendez2, Alfredo Marhx3, Sean Boerner4 (1) Veritas VES, Villahermosa, Mexico (2) PEMEX E&P, Villahermosa, Mexico (3) PEMEX Exploración y Producción, Poza Rica, Veracruz, Mexico (4) Veritas VES, Houston, TX
The Poza Rica field is one of the oldest in
Three major carbonate facies are present. 1- consists
of non-reservoir suspension deposits composed of peloidal/skeletal lime
mudstones to wackestones that are variably dolomitic. 2- facies
consists of transported, shallow shelf peloidal/bioclastic packstones with thin
interbeds of chaotic breccias. 3- This facies consists of transported, detrital
breccias.
Based on the petrophysical analysis and fluid substitutions, a
combination of Lambda-Rho and Mu-Rho could be used to predict fluid types
within the reservoir. While lithology variations were more evident within the
intervals of interest than fluid changes, it was clear that seismic data could
be used to predict fluid content within the reservoir, at the time the seismic
survey was acquired.
The well to seismic tie process provided the wavelet that was
used for the inversion and also the time/depth relationship, for relating the
rock properties from the wells to the seismic.
The time
horizons were the boundaries of the 3D models that were used for the deterministic
and stochastic inversions. These results were the input as a covariate in the
joint stochastic inversion. Simultaneously were modeled Vp,
Vs, and density, which were then converted to Lambda-Rho and Mu-Rho. These
horizons were also converted to depth along with the Lambda-Rho and Mu-Rho
attributes.These results were then combined using the fluid substitution
results from seven wells in the field, to predict fluids.