uGeneral statement

uFigures

uImaging methods

uExamples

uConclusions

uReferences

uGeneral statement

uFigures

uImaging methods

uExamples

uConclusions

uReferences

uGeneral statement

uFigures

uImaging methods

uExamples

uConclusions

uReferences

uGeneral statement

uFigures

uImaging methods

uExamples

uConclusions

uReferences

Imaging Methods

As shown in Figure 1, a hypothetical salt trend is imaged with three cable tows that traverse the area in three different azimuth directions. In this manner, sub-salt geology is imaged with overlapping layers of data, each data layer representing a different azimuth in which the data-acquisition template moves across the geologic target area. The objective is to create a uniform illumination of any target that is below the image-distorting salt layer. There are several options for the geometrical configuration of the source/cable system that is towed along each of these traverses:

· One possibility is shown as Figure 2a. In this option, data are acquired with a narrow-azimuth geometry that involves 10 or 12 parallel hydrophone cables spaced to form an acquisition template approximately one kilometer wide and perhaps 10 or 12 kilometers long. Several arrays of air guns are distributed across this cable spread.

· A second data-acquisition scheme, illustrated in Figure 2b, involves multiple vessels that generate wider-azimuth data in a single tow. Here the center vessel tows a narrow-azimuth data-acquisition system, but its companion source vessels increase the source-to-receiver azimuth aperture by a factor of three or more compared to the azimuth range of the system described by Figure 2a.

If this wide-azimuth concept is used to acquire the overlapping data layers in Figure 1, the azimuths of the raypaths arriving at each subsurface imaging point are almost uniformly distributed around the complete 360-degree azimuth circle, and there is a greater likelihood that uniform target illumination is achieved.

Examples

Examples of the increased geological information provided by multi-azimuth seismic imaging are illustrated as Figures 3 and 4. The data in Figure 3 come from a deepwater area of the Nile Delta where a thick, rugose anhydrite layer complicates the imaging of deeper targets. One of the target objects below this image-distorting layer is shown in this data comparison. The improvements in target details seen in the six-azimuth image are significant compared to what can be seen in the traditional single-azimuth image.

The example in Figure 4 is across Mad Dog Field in the Gulf of Mexico. The improvements in data quality and in image detail when multi-azimuth technology is used are impressive.

Conclusions

Industry interest in multi-azimuth seismic technology is growing because the technique creates such dramatic improvements in the images of complex, hard-to-see, sub-salt targets. Both theory and data-processing tests have shown that compared to single-azimuth data, multi-azimuth data can:

· Improve the overall signal-to-noise ratio of sub-salt data.

· Allow better removal of diffraction noise.

· Create a more uniform illumination of targets below layers that distort raypath distributions.

· Increase lateral resolution of data.

· Produce more accurate amplitude attributes.

· Provide better attenuation of multiples.

Any one of these factors is a significant improvement in seismic technology. Collectively, this list forms a compelling reason to implement multi-azimuth tows of wide-azimuth arrays to define sub-salt drilling targets.

References

Keggin, J., T. Manning, W. Rietveld, C. Page, E. Fromyr, and R. van Borselen, 2006,

Key aspects of multi-azimuth acquisition and processing: SEG Expanded Abstracts, v. 25, p. 2886.

Michell, S., E. Shoshitaishvili, D. Chergotis, J. Sharp, and J. Etgen, 2006, Wide azimuth streamer imaging of mad dog; have we solved the subsalt imaging problem?: SEG Expanded Abstracts, v. 25, p. 2905.

Return to top.