Datapages, Inc.Print this page

 

PSParameters Controlling Mudstone Sealing Capacity

By

Sally J. Sutton1, Frank G. Ethridge1, William C. Dawson2, and William R. Almon2

 

Search and Discovery Article #40205 (2006)

Posted July 20, 2006

 

*Poster presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, Houston, Texas, April 9-12, 2006

 

Click to view posters in PDF format.

Poster 1 (7.0 mb)        Poster 2 (2.4 mb)        Poster 3 (1.2 mb)    

 

1Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO ([email protected]; [email protected])

2Chevron Inc, Houston, TX ([email protected]; [email protected])

 

Abstract 

Studies in several basins have shown that mudstone sealing capacity, as determined by MICP analysis, is highly variable among superficially similar samples. Detailed consideration of a variety of mudstone parameters, both textural and compositional, suggests that a combination of these parameters determines sealing capacity and that these parameters are in turn controlled by sequence stratigraphic setting. Which parameters are most important may depend on lithologic details of the mudstones. The parameters considered include silt content, carbonate content and timing, organic matter content and orientation, matrix content and fabric, bioturbation, and ash content. Among the parameters we have identified, silt content is generally only important above a threshold abundance, probably about 20%. Above that silt threshold, sealing capacity degrades. Organic matter abundance and preferred orientation correlate with high sealing capacity in carbonate-poor mudstones, but are less important in carbonate-rich ones. High carbonate content can be associated with either excellent seals or poor seals, depending on the nature of the carbonate. Early carbonate, such as in firmgrounds, is generally associated with very high sealing capacity, although there appears to be a maximum carbonate abundance that is optimal. Late carbonate cement, on the other hand, is generally associated with poor seals. In carbonate-poor mudstones, bioturbation is typically found in poor seals, but if bioturbation is extreme and homogenizes the rock, sealing capacity may be high. Integration of microscopic layers of volcanic ash into mudstones degrades sealing capacity, although well-defined bentonite layers may be excellent seals.

 

Selected Figures 

Location map for samples from Denver Basin. 

Denver Basin stratigraphic column, with details of Dakota Group and Mowry/Graneros Shale in regard to sequence stratigraphy.

Location maps for samples from Ventura Basin, California.

Location map for samples from Washakie Basin.

Location map for samples from Ainsa and Jaca basins, Pyrenees (modified from Pickering and Corregidor, 2005).

Stratigraphic cross section of Ainsa and Jaca basins (modified from Mutti et al., 1985; Mutti and Seguret, 1987).

 

References 

Castelblanco-Torres, B., 2003, Distribution of sealing capacity within a sequence stratigraphic framework:  Upper Cretaceous Lewis shale, south-central Wyoming: M.S. Thesis, Colorado State University, 194 p.

Edwards, K.K. 1999, Sequence stratigraphic framework for top seal development: examples from the Skull Creek and Graneros shales, Denver Basin: M.S. thesis, Colorado State University, 473 p.

Labaume, P., Mutti, E., and Seguret, M., 1987, Megaturbidites: a depositional model from the Eocene of the SW-Pyrenean foreland basin, Spain: Geo-Marine Letters, v. 7, p. 91–101.

Mutti, E., Remacha, E., Sgavetti, M., Rosell, J., Valloni, R., and Zamorano, M., 1985, Stratigraphy and facies characteristics of the Eocene Hecho Group turbidite systems, south-central Pyrenees, in Mila, M.D., and Rosell, J., eds., International Association of Sedimentologists, 6th European Regional Meeting, Llerida, Excursion Guidebook, p. 521–576.

Mutti, E., and Seguret, M., 1987, Megaturbidites; a depositional model from the Eocene of the SW-Pyrenean foreland basin, Spain: Geo-Marine Letters, v. 7, p. 91-101.

Obligado, A.A., 2003, Sealing capacity, shale characteristics, and sequence stratigraphy of the Juncal Formation, Ventura Basin, southern California: M.S. Thesis, Colorado State University, 146 p.

Pemberton, S. G., Frey, R. W., Ranger, M. J., and MacEachern, J, 1992.  The conceptual framework of ichnology, in S. G. Pemberton, ed., Applications of ichnology to petroleum exploration: SEPM Core Workshop No. 17, p. 1-32.

Pickering, K.T., and Corregidor, J., 2005.  Mass transport complexes and tectonic control on confined basin-floor submarine fans, Middle Eocene, south Spanish Pyrenees, in Hodgson, D.M. and Flint, S.S., eds., Submarine Slope Systems: Processes and Products, Geological Society of London Special Publication 244, p. 51-74.

Sutton, S., J., Ethridge, F. G., Almon, W. R., Dawson, W. C., and Edwards, K. K., 2004, Textural and sequence-stratigraphic controls on sealing capacity of Lower and Upper Cretaceous Shales, Denver Basin, Colorado: AAPG Bulletin, v. 88, p. 1185-1206.