Large Erosional Slope Channels and the New Challenge; Low Relief
Sandy Channel Levees
Mayall, Mike1 (1)
BP, Sunbury on
Large scale (1-3km wide, 50-200m thick) erosional channels are now extensively recognised
on slope systems. The main components of these channels, the sinuosity, facies patterns, repeated history
of cutting and filling and complexity of the internal stacking patterns are
widely recognised. With increasing well log and core
data, the characterisation of the reservoirs can be
done with growing confidence. However there are an important range of issues
which require further study, among which are - Sinuosity, there are clearly
different types of sinuosity in channels, are they related? Is it important?
How does the fill of levee channels differ from erosionally
confined channels? What is backfilling – does it really exist? In addition to
the large erosionally confined channels, smaller
low-relief channel levees are becoming increasingly important. They are usually
5-30m thick and on seismic data often form a single trough-peak loop. These
channels have axis which are tens to hundreds of metres
wide and sandy levees which commonly extend hundreds of metres,
or more, away from the channel axis. The channel axis is most commonly
mud-filled but sandy axis also occur. Although this
style of channel can be well imaged on seismic there are many challenges to
effective development of the resources. Additionally there are few, if any,
outcrop descriptions of this channel style. These types of channels are so
common in slope systems that they must occur in outcrops but have yet to be
identified.
AAPG Search and Discover Article #90063©2007 AAPG Annual Convention, Long Beach, California