Modeling
Crevasse Splay Versus Point-Bar Bodies: Relative Roles in Characterizing
Tight-Gas Fluvial Reservoir Successions
Anderson, Donna S.1, Mary M.
Carr1 (1)
Crevasse splay bodies are likely
effective reservoirs in many thick tight-gas fluvial successions, yet they are
incompletely recognized and lack the same level of dimensional data as point
bars within channelbelts. A 200-ft thick vertical
succession of strata within a 160-acre outcrop area within the nonmarine part of the Upper Cretaceous, lower Iles Formation (Neslen Formation
of Utah), north of Rangely, Colorado, shows the
dramatic differences between crevasse-splay and point-bar bodies. The outcrop
contains an upward change from isolated, stacked crevasse channel/splay
sandstone bodies to those of point bars within a 1500-ft wide, sinuous meanderbelt. All sandstone bodies show similar “average”
statistics: they contain the same types and gross proportions of grain sizes
and facies classified by sedimentary structures, with
high net-to-gross sandstone (over 90%), similar gross rock volumes (1000 to
1500 acre-ft), and average thicknesses (about 18 ft). By contrast, the map-view
dimensions and geometries and the internal facies
architecture and proportions are completely different for the splay and point
bar deposits due to dissimilar, yet related, depositional processes. In
addition, individual point bars are in poor lateral communication within the meanderbelt, whereas individual crevasse-splay bodies are
laterally widespread and laterally contiguous with other crevasse-splay bodies.
3-D modeling clarifies body types and
dimensions, vertical and lateral geometric relationships, and yields insights
regarding the interplay of sedimentologic processes
within different architectural elements. Modeling combined with outcrop
observations yield clues as to why crevasse splay bodies are under-recognized
from limited subsurface data. For example, crevasse channels can be confused
with multistory channels when observed in an isolated outcrop or other
laterally confined dataset. In addition, a high proportion of mudclast lags at the bases of proximal crevasse-splay
channels could be misinterpreted in 1-D data as reflecting “braided stream”
conditions.
AAPG Search and Discover Article #90063©2007 AAPG Annual Convention, Long Beach, California