Comparison of
Deepwater Mass Transport Complex Settings:
Amerman, Robert1,
Bruce Trudgill1, Eric P. Nelson1, Michael H. Gardner2,
Pau Arbués3, Jim Borer4, Julian
Clark5, Grace L. Ford6, Hugo Ortner7, Douglas
Paton1, Piret Plink-Björklund1,
David Pyles1 (1) Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (2) Montana
State University, Billings, MT (3) University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
(4) El Paso Corporation, Denver, CO (5) Chevron Energy Technology Company, San
Ramon, CA (6) EOG Resources, Denver, CO (7) University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria
Submarine mass transport complexes (MTCs) are an important component of deepwater stratigraphic successions. They indicate basin or hinterland
reorganization, control the location and geometry of overlying sand reservoirs,
and may act as barriers to fluid flow. MTCs comprise
a significant portion of the sedimentary fill of three paleo-deepwater
basins: the
Among these three basins, MTCs display both similarities and differences with respect
to: 1) types and styles of soft-sediment structures, 2) internal stratigraphic architecture, 3) degree of bedding coherence,
4) hierarchal and areal distribution, 5) position in stratigraphic cycles, 6) volume, and 7) relationships to
reservoir-quality sands and underlying topography.
Data collected to date during this
ongoing study suggest that deepwater MTCs may possess certain fundamental
characteristics (e.g., some types of internal structures, position in stratigraphic cycles) that do not vary with respect to
differences in setting but that may vary in other respects (e.g., internal stratigraphic organization, areal
distribution, internal bedding coherence) that are a function of the three
basin variables described above.
AAPG Search and Discover Article #90063©2007 AAPG Annual Convention, Long Beach, California