Click to view article in PDF format.
Naturally Underpressured Reservoirs: Applying the Compartment Concept to the Safe Disposal of Liquid Waste*
By
Jim Puckette1 and Zuhair Al-Shaieb1
Search and Discovery Article #40071 (2003)
*Online adaptation of presentation at AAPG Southwest Section Meeting, Fort Worth, TX, March, 2003 (www.southwestsection.org)
1School of Geology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 ( [email protected] ) ( [email protected] )
The Oklahoma Panhandle region
contains abnormally low-pressure reservoirs that are isolated from the shallow
hydrostatic domain and overpressured reservoirs in the deep Anadarko basin.
These underpressured reservoirs, which can be identified and mapped using
available petroleum industry data, are potential repositories for liquid waste.
They contain naturally low pore-fluid pressures and are completely sealed by
thick confining units. Many of these compartments contain oil and gas. Fluid
withdrawal during production has further reduced reservoir
pressures,
facilitating disposal by lowering injection and displacement pressures.
Types and sizes of compartments were strongly influenced by depositional environment. Individual channel-filling sandstones within valley-fill sequences form small-compartments, whereas sandstone reservoirs formed from sediments reworked during marine transgressions became large ones. Within the carbonate domain, thick accumulations of grain-rich sediment, subsequently altered by dissolution and/or dolomitization, form large- to regional-sized compartments. Selected sandstone and carbonate reservoirs have calculated disposal volumes ranging from approximately 0.5 million barrels to 21 million barrels per well.
Compartmentalized reservoirs with abnormally low fluid pressures offer an intriguing alternative for liquid waste disposal. They exist as self-contained vessels whose seals have confined pore-fluid pressures for durations of geologic time. Seal longevity and integrity are evidenced by the very existence of naturally occurring subnormal pressures that did not equalize with the normally pressured hydrostatic environment. These reservoirs, by virtue of their compartmentalized nature, fulfill two critical criteria for safe liquid waste disposal, (1) non-migration and (2) total isolation from the sphere of human activities.
Naturally
underpressured reservoir
compartments offer an intriguing option for the safe
disposal of liquid wastes. Pore pressures in underpressured reservoirs are often
lower than the hydrostatic pressure generated by a column of freshwater.
Compartmentalized reservoirs in sedimentary basins, by virtue of their
three-dimensional sealing, meet two critical criteria concerning the confinement
of liquid toxic waste, (1) isolation from the surficial environment and (2)
non-migration.
Abnormally low
fluid pressure is evidence that a proposed injection zone is a compartment and
isolated from its surroundings. In contrast, near-normal pressure suggests that
the reservoir
is part of a larger hydrostatic or hydrodynamic system. Fluid type
is equally important. Underpressured oil- and gas-bearing compartments,
especially pressure-depleted ones, have injection and displacement pressures
that are much lower than water-filled, normally pressured reservoirs.
Pressure
data provided by the oil and gas industry are used to demonstrate that naturally
underpressured reservoir
compartments are common in the Oklahoma and Texas
Panhandle area of the Southern Midcontinent region. These compartments, which
often contain pressures that are further reduced by oil and gas production, are
potential repositories for injected liquid waste.
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
uUnderpressured disposal zones uIntermediate-size compartment
|
Disposal Zones and the Compartment Concept The
discovery of abnormally pressured fluid in deep basins altered the
conventional interpretation of basin fluid flow. Abnormal Abnormal fluid pressure for a given depth will plot either higher or lower than the benchmark gradient. Abnormally high pressure (overpressure) was initially recognized in the Gulf Coast basin. This was followed by the revelation that abnormally low pressure (underpressure) existed. Bradley (1975) proposed that abnormal fluid pressures are isolated from their surroundings by seals. These seals prevent abnormal pressures, which may deviate widely from the hydrostatic pressure, from equalizing with the normally pressured (hydrostatic/hydrodynamic) environment. Bradley and Powley (1994; 1987) presented evidence that sedimentary basins are typically divided into a network of compartments that are isolated by sealing rocks. Compartments are highly variable in size, ranging from less than 1 mi2 (2.6 km2) to tens or hundreds of mi2 in areal extent. Individual compartments are recognized by their fluid pressures, which are distinctly different from pressures in adjacent compartments or non-compartmentalized (hydrostatic/hydrodynamic) reservoirs. Large fluid compartments situated well below the base of fresh water (outside the sphere of human activity) and located in geologically stable areas may be ideal repositories for toxic liquid wastes. Furthermore, if these compartments are underpressured relative to fluid pressures in strata positioned above and below, leaks or punctures in the enclosing seals would result in an initial net inflow of fluid into the compartment, thereby preventing the escape of waste.
Compartmentalization of Western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle The
subsurface rock column in western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle is
compartmentalized and divided into distinct pressure domains (Al-Shaieb
and others, 1994a; 1994b). Within the Anadarko basin (Figure
1), three
general fluid-pressure domains are recognized: (1) shallow normal
pressure, (2) overpressure that extends from a depth of approximately
10,000 ft to the Woodford Shale, and (3) deep normal pressure below the
Woodford Shale in The significance of seals is illustrated by the change in pressure values within the Morrowan interval across western Oklahoma. Morrowan reservoirs in the deep Anadarko basin have abnormally high pore-fluid pressures that approach lithostatic values (Al-Shaieb and others 1992; 1994a). In contrast, Morrowan pore-fluid pressures in the Oklahoma Panhandle are often less than one half of the hydrostatic value (Puckette, 1996). A pressure-depth gradient map and generalized potentiometric surface diagram (Figures 2 and 3) illustrate this regional change in pressure.
Stratigraphy and Pressure Architecture in the Oklahoma Panhandle Region The
Oklahoma Panhandle region contains underpressured, compartmentalized
reservoirs. They were identified using some two thousand measurements of
Pressure-depth profiles and potentiometric surface maps illustrate a significant vertical differentiation in pressure across the stratigraphic column in the Oklahoma Panhandle. In the western Panhandle near the Keyes Dome (Figure 4), six separate groupings or domains are recognized. They are separated by relatively flat-lying stratigraphic seals that correlate to evaporite or shale beds (Figure 5). Six regional seal zones subdivide the rock column in the panhandle region (Figure 5). Descending, the first seal occurs below the base of freshwater and separates it from gas- and brine-bearing reservoirs in the Tubb and Red Cave intervals. Important, low-permeability beds in this seal include the shale-rich Cloud Chief Formation, Whitehorse Group and Dog Creek Shale, the Blaine Gypsum, the shale- and salt- dominated Hennessey Shale and Cimarron Anhydrite (Figure 5). The second seal includes the lower part of the Hennessey Shale and the evaporite-rich Wellington Formation. This seal separates Tubb and Red Cave reservoirs from those in the underlying Chase and Council Grove Groups. The third seal zone is the shale-dominated interval below the Council Grove Group. It separates Permian-age Council Grove and Chase Group reservoirs from those in the deeper Pennsylvanian Virgilian and Missourian Series. The fourth regional seal separates Pennsylvanian Missourian and Desmoinesian reservoirs from those in the Morrowan interval. This seal coincides with the Desmoinesian ‘Cherokee’ and Atokan shales. Seal five is the upper Morrowan shale. It isolates upper Morrowan sandstone reservoirs from lower Morrowan and Mississippian Chesterian ones. The sixth seal (not shown on Figure 5) separates the lower Morrowan/Chesterian interval from reservoirs in the Ordovician Simpson Group and the Cambro-Ordovician Arbuckle Group. The shallowest pressure domain is near surface and associated with freshwater aquifers, including the Ogallala. This shallow hydrostatic domain extends to the Blaine Anhydrite/Gypsum (Figures 4 and 5). Pre-irrigation potentiometric surfaces in the fresh water aquifer approached or intersected the surface (Schoff and Stovall, 1943). The original pressure-depth gradient in the freshwater system (0.433 psi/ft) is reduced as a result of lowering of the water table (potentiometric surface) by irrigation. The second pressure domain starts beneath the Blaine seal and extends downward to the Wellington seal. Reservoirs in this interval have pressure-depth gradient values around 0.24 psi/ft (Figure 4) and potentiometric surfaces close to 2500 ft (760 m) above sea level. The third important pressure domain includes reservoirs of the Permian Chase Group that are located below the Wellington seal interval. In the Keyes area, these reservoirs have pressure-depth gradients around 0.15 psi/ft and potentiometric surfaces around 700 ft (210 m) above sea level. The highest-pressure values recorded in pre-Permian rocks are found in the Pennsylvanian upper Morrowan reservoirs. Upper Morrowan (Purdy) sandstone reservoirs have pressure-depth values that range from 0.25 to 0.29 psi/ft and a maximum potentiometric surface around 2600 ft (790 m). This value is still well below the average surface elevation of 3300 ft (1000 m). These Purdy values are considerably higher than pressure-depth gradient values of 0.20 and potentiometric surfaces of 1500 ft (460 m) measured for the underlying lower Morrowan (Keyes) sandstone and Mississippian reservoirs. The Keyes Sandstone is separated from the Purdy Sandstone by a shale seal. Pressure regimes below the Mississippian are not well defined, but pressure measurements from deeper Arbuckle reservoirs in the region suggest a return to near-hydrostatic pressure with depth.
Compartmentalization is apparent when distinct pressure measurements or
fluid types indicate Localized compartmentalization of the Morrow (an operational term for Morrowan) is evident in the panhandle. In the Keyes area, lower Morrow Keyes sandstone and Mississippian Chester (operational term for Chesterian) reservoirs have pressure-depth gradients around 0.2 psi/ft, whereas those in the upper Morrow ‘Purdy’ sandstone are 0.25 psi/ft (Figure 4). In contrast, pressure measurements from Beaver County indicate Keyes and Chester p-d gradients have increased to around 0.28 psi/ft and 0.36 psi/ft respectively, whereas upper Morrow gradients remained around 0.23 to 0.25 psi/ft. Consequently, upper Morrow reservoirs, which were the highest-pressured in the Keyes area, have the lowest p-d gradients in the Beaver area (Figure 6). This switch in relative pressure is evidence that the Purdy and Keyes/Chester reservoirs are independent fluid-pressure systems, isolated by seals. Sealed, three-dimensionally isolated pressure compartments offer a naturally occurring system that fits the no-migration criterion of an ideal disposal zone. Within the Oklahoma Panhandle region, example compartments were classified by type and size and systematically evaluated as potential disposal sites.
Potential Underpressured Disposal Zones Several underpressured reservoirs were characterized for geologic suitability as disposal zones. Specific criteria considered included porosity and permeability, thickness and areal extent, and confining seals. Porosity measurements were taken from wire-line logs, thin-section petrography, and the literature. Thickness and areal extent were established by mapping. Fluid types and pressure measurements were used to confirm compartment boundaries. The integrity of confining units was evaluated by determining their lithology, thickness, and distribution. Seal continuity was evaluated by examining the site area for faults or factures that could transect confining units and become conduits for migration. Compartments were classified by host lithology and size. Once classified as carbonate or siliciclastic, compartments were subdivided based on the volume of liquid petroleum or equivalent volume of gas they had produced. Types and sizes of compartments were strongly influenced by depositional environment. Individual channel-filling sandstones within valley-fill sequences form small compartments. On the other hand, sandstone bodies formed from sediments that were reworked and redistributed during marine transgression became large compartments. Within the carbonate domain, thick accumulations of grain-rich sediments that were subsequently dissolved and/or dolomitized form large, even regional compartments. In contrast, those formed from thin, grain-rich shoals in heterolithic assemblages are small.
Sandstone Example: Large Compartment The lower
Morrowan Keyes sandstone in Keyes field, Cimarron and Texas Counties
Oklahoma is used to illustrate a potential large siliciclastic disposal
zone. The sandstone forms thicker trends in valleys on the eroded
Mississippian topography and sheet-like deposits as a result of
reworking during a marine transgression. Sandstone thickness is highly
variable and net Thickness
maps were used to determine trends and thickness of the Keyes Porosity in the Keyes Sandstone is mostly secondary and resulted from dissolution of labile grains (Puckette, 1996; Gerken, 1992). Average porosity is approximately 15% and highly variable, primarily as a result of carbonate cement. Reported average permeability values range from 58 md to 100 md (Kansas Geological Survey, 1959; Stevens, 1960).
Sandstone Example: Intermediate-Size Compartment The NE Rice
field in T.3N., R.10ECM, Texas County Oklahoma, is used to illustrate an
intermediate size Porosity
values in the ‘lower’ Purdy sandstone range from 8 to 25% and average
21% (Harrison, 1990). Williams (1961) reported that typical permeability
in the ‘lower’ Purdy sandstone was 557 md. Net The ‘lower’
Purdy sandstone in NE Rice field is primarily an oil The total encasement of valley fill sandstones in drilling-defined low permeability clay-rich rocks may make these sandstones ideal repositories for extremely toxic liquid waste. Though these reservoirs are volumetrically smaller than other types, their well-defined three-dimensional confinement ensures their fulfilling the no-migration criterion of an ideal disposal zone. Compartmentalized reservoirs with abnormally low fluid pressures offer an intriguing alternative for liquid waste disposal. They exist as self-contained vessels whose seals have confined pore-fluid pressures for durations of geologic time. Seal longevity and integrity are evidenced by the existence of abnormally low pressures that have not equalized with the hydrostatic environment. The underpressured compartmentalized reservoirs discussed in this paper have different capacities, but these common features: 1. Original pore-fluid pressures that were less than those in deeper and shallower strata, and considerably lower than normal pressure, 2. Mappable, three-dimensionally isolated or compartmentalized geometry, 3. Thick confining beds that are not folded or offset by transecting faults, and 4. Pore-fluid pressures that are reduced by oil and gas production, resulting in lower injection and displacement pressures. These
naturally underpressured reservoirs meet the no-migration criterion of
an ideal liquid waste disposal zone. Their confining beds should remain
intact as long as they are not repressured above original
(pre-production) natural values. In addition, example reservoirs are
delineated by oil and gas boreholes that could be converted to
REFERENCES
Al-Shaieb, Z., Puckette, J., and Close, A., 2002, Seal
Al-Shaieb, Z., J. Puckette, P. Ely, and V. Tigert, 1992, Pressure compartments and seals in the Anadarko basin, in Johnson, K. S., and Cardott, B. J. (eds.), Source Rocks in the Southern Midcontinent, Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 93, p. 210-228. Al-Shaieb, Z., J. Puckette, A. A. Abdalla, and P. Ely, 1994a, Mega compartment complex in the Anadarko basin: a completely sealed overpressured phenomenon, in Ortoleva, P. J. (ed.) Basin compartments and Seals: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 61, p. 55-68. Al-Shaieb, Z., J. Puckette, A. A. Abdalla, and P. Ely, 1994b, Three levels of compartmentation within the overpressured interval of the Anadarko basin, in Ortoleva, P. J. (ed.) Basin compartments and Seals: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 61, p. 69-83. Bradley, J. S., 1975, Abnormal fluid pressure: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin v. 59, p. 957-973. Bradley, J. S., 1985, Safe disposal of toxic and radioactive liquid wastes: Geology v. 13, p. 328-329. Bradley, J. S., and D. E. Powley, 1987, Pressure compartments: unpublished manuscript. Bradley, J. S., and D. E. Powley, 1994, Pressure compartments in sedimentary basins: a review, in Ortoleva, P. J. (ed.) Basin compartments and Seals: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 61, p. 3-26. Dahlberg, E. C., 1995, Applied hydrodynamics in petroleum exploration: Springer-Verlag, New York, 281 p. Gerken, L. D., 1992, Morrowan sandstones in south-central Texas County, Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University unpublished M.S. thesis, 414 p. Harrison, J. C., 1990, “Upper” Morrow Purdy sandstones in parts of Texas and Cimarron Counties, Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University unpublished M.S. thesis, 95 p. Kansas Geological Survey, 1959, Taloga field, in Kansas Oil and Gas Fields, v. II, p. 182-186. Powley, D. E., 1990, Pressures and hydrogeology in petroleum basins: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 29, p. 215-226. Puckette, J. O., 1996, Evaluation of underpressured reservoirs as potential repositories for liquid waste: Oklahoma State University unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 273 p. Schoff, S. L., and J. W. Stovall, 1943, Geology and groundwater resources of Cimarron County, Oklahoma: Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 64, 317 p. Stevens, C. and D. Stevens, 1960, Hugoton embayment-Anadarko basin handbook: National Petroleum Bibliography, Amarillo Texas, p. 227. Stuart, C. A., 1970, Geopressures: Shell Oil Company, 121 p. Williams, W. W., 1961, Northwest Eva field, Texas County, Oklahoma, in Gas Fields of the Texas and Oklahoma Panhandles: Panhandle Geological Society, p. 250-252. |