[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view article in PDF format.

 

GCA New Approach to Stratigraphic Interpretation*

 

Farrukh Qayyum1, Nanne Hemstra1, and Paul de Groot1

 

Search and Discovery Article #41195 (2013)

Posted September 16, 2013

 

*Adapted from the Geophysical Corner column, prepared by the authors, in AAPG Explorer, September, 2013.
Editor of Geophysical Corner is Satinder Chopra ([email protected]). Managing Editor of AAPG Explorer is Vern Stefanic

 

1dGB Earth Sciences, Enschede, Netherlands ([email protected])

 

General Statement

This article introduces a new set of seismic attributes that play an important role in extracting detailed stratigraphic information from seismic data. The attributes in question are derived from a HorizonCube, one of the emerging interpretation techniques that provide fully interpreted seismic volumes (Figure 1). In this particular technique, horizons are automatically tracked between a given set of framework horizons and faults. The tracking is done using a seismic dip volume.

Compared with conventional amplitude tracking, this algorithm is more robust in areas with low signal-to-noise ratio, where diachronous events can be tracked as well as events that are phase inconsistent. As these horizons are guided by a continuous dip-field, they may converge and diverge according to the dip of a seismic reflector. In this way, the key geologic features such as unconformities, pinchouts and condensed sections are highlighted. Horizons can be tracked in two different modes (Figure 1):

  • As continuous horizons that stay together when they converge and never cross each other. Such horizons help identify unconformities and condensed sections – particularly useful in 3-D attributes visualization and reservoir modeling.
  • As truncated horizons that may stop when they meet each other in space based on a user-defined threshold. This helps to identify stratigraphic lapouts (onlaps, downlaps and top laps). These also are useful in Wheeler diagram creation and sequence stratigraphic interpretation.

General statement

Figures

New attributes

Example

Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General statement

Figures

New attributes

Example

Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General statement

Figures

New attributes

Example

Conclusion

Figure Captions

Figure 1. A HorizonCube consists of a set of auto-tracked seismic horizons using a pre-computed dip volume. This is an exponent of an emerging group of global interpretation techniques.

Figure 2. A deepwater channel system of the Australian Northwest Shelf is sub-divided into several channel stages Previous HitattributeNext Hit volume. Top: Color-coded channel stages are overlain on the seismic data. Bottom: Time-slicing through the channel stages in a flattened domain (channels top).

Figure 3. Same channel systems are visualized using HorizonCube density Previous HitattributeNext Hit. Note that the locations of higher densities values mostly correspond to channel base, levees or over-bank regions.

New Family of Stratigraphic Attributes

For the continuous set of seismic horizons, a new family of attributes can be computed that visualize geologic features previously hidden. Attributes include:

  • Isochron thickness – This Previous HitattributeNext Hit highlights not only sedimentary bodies but also picks up local pinchouts, condensed intervals and local unconformities.
  • Curvature – This curvature Previous HitattributeNext Hit tends to be smoother than the conventional volume curvature Previous HitattributeNext Hit, computed using the seismic dip volume without mapping.
  • HorizonCube density – Events can be counted within user-defined time windows, with high-density values corresponding to horizon convergence and low density values corresponding to the horizon divergence. The “HorizonCube density Previous HitattributeNext Hit” helps define the zones of pinch-outs, condensed sections and unconformities.
  • Arbitrary layers – A dense set of seismic horizons can be separated into a set of arbitrary (stratigraphically uninterpreted) layers that divide the mapped seismic horizons into fix layers with a unique ID for each layer. This plays an important role in quality control where visualizing hundreds of horizons can often be slow and laborious.
  • Derivatives – Finally, first or second derivatives on a set of horizon events can be extended to perform a derivative on an isochron between a given ranges of events. These attributes measure subtle geometrical changes and discontinuities.
  • From a stratigraphic interpretation standpoint, the mapped seismic horizons in truncated form can be sub-divided into sequence stratigraphic units through the co-visualization of a structural domain and a Wheeler domain in conjunction with well data. In both domains various data, such as wells and seismic, can be combined to interpret a set of sequence stratigraphic units, such as systems tracts and sequences.

    Typical attributes that are extracted using this sequence stratigraphic framework include stratigraphic unit IDs (identification number) and isochrons. The IDs of interpreted stratigraphic units can either be unique (each systems tract unit is assigned a unique identification number) or common (each identical systems tract is assigned a common number).

    An isochron Previous HitattributeNext Hit calculated the thickness of a stratigraphic unit. The unit of this Previous HitattributeNext Hit depends on the seismic survey type (TWT or in depth). This is a key Previous HitattributeNext Hit to understand how sedimentation filled a sedimentary basin as a function of geologic time.

    The relative rate of preservation – the ratio between an isochron volume and a known geologic time-span for a particular unit – also can be calculated with the results being relative measurements of the rate of preservation per geological time unit. Finally, an Previous HitattributeNext Hit can be generated that defines the difference between two isochron grids as a volume at a certain trace location.

    Example: Extracting Deepwater Channel Stages

    During the Neogene Period, the Carnarvon Basin in the Australian Northwest Shelf comprised several deepwater meandering channelized systems. One of those systems is studied using the new stratigraphic unit ID Previous HitattributeNext Hit. To our knowledge, this is the first study in which this Previous HitattributeNext Hit was used to define an unconventional set of stratigraphic units.

    Convention nomenclatures are not adopted, as the interval may fall in one systems tract. Therefore, a further subdivision of channel system requires a new sequence model. In this case, a “channel stages” sequence model is defined. It contains a set of N stratigraphic units defined as channel stages. Each unit is defined by its own unique ID.

    Upper and lower boundaries of the channel system were manually mapped to form an initial framework to process the densely mapped set of seismic horizons. Within such a framework, a data-driven collection of densely mapped seismic horizons was created. These were then sub-divided into a channel stages model that contained a user-defined set of color-coded stages. The criteria of sub-dividing a channel system into its stages are based on observations of features such as crosscutting relationships, timing and geomorphologic patterns.

    Five channel stages can be seen in Figure 2. The same interval also can be studied using the density Previous HitattributeTop (Figure 3), which clearly shows channel base, levees and banks of channel systems.

    Conclusion

    Workflows such as these support building better stratigraphic models to predict reservoir quality sands and to perform reservoir characterization. Dense sets of seismic horizons help in defining new stratigraphic attributes – and these attributes help in understanding stratigraphy and geomorphology, and can be used as a means of performing stratigraphic interpretation on seismic data.

    Return to top.