Print this page
Click to view poster in PDF format.
PSAutomatic Detection of the Degree of Compaction in Reservoir Rocks Based on Visual Knowledge*
Carlos Eduardo Santin1, Mara Abel2, Karin Goldberg3 and Luiz Fernando De Ros3
Search and Discovery Article #80061 (2009)
Posted October 15, 2009
* Adapted from poster presentation at AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, June 7-10, 2009.
1Endeeper Rock Knowledge Systems, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil ([email protected])
2Institute of Informatics, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
3Petroleum Geology Program, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
A
low-cost method is proposed for evaluating the degree of compaction in
reservoir rocks by using automatic inference methods on optical
photomicrographs. In order to reproduce the visual interpretation performed
during petrographic analysis, a hybrid method was developed combining
image-processing algorithms with knowledge representation and reasoning models.
The method proposed was inspired on visual attention, the mechanism used
by the human brain for dealing with visual information. This mechanism allows
the brain to filter the huge amount of information that comes through the eyes,
selecting
the relevant elements to be further analysed by the highly abstract
level of reasoning. The process involves the decomposition of scenes, and the
competition among their different aspects in order to isolate and select the
relevant areas. In other words, the eyes of petrographers initially examine a
thin-section by capturing and isolating the grains borders (outlines), and then
focus on the grains. The outlines are essential to separate each grain from
other grains and their interstices, because petrographic analysis is performed
in the two-dimensional universe of thin-sections. The knowledge at this level
is modelled in terms of Sections (grains), Outlines (borders of
grains), and Interstices, which may be Pores (empty) or NonPores (e.g. cement, matrix). The shapes of the outlines (mainly concave or
convex), complemented by the detection of the impregnation blue resin,
indicates if they contain Pores, NonPores or Sections. The
types of contacts between grains are then used to define the degree of
compaction of the rocks. The system provides a preliminary identification of
the objects that can be interactively refined by the user when the grain
outlines are unclear in the images. The evaluation of compaction degree
provided by this method is far more sensitive and precise than those based on
the intergranular volume or number of intergranular contacts. This formalized
interpretation method shows better results for the complex tasks of reservoir
quality characterization and prediction.
|
uCompaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks uKnowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
uCompaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks uKnowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
uCompaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks uKnowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
uCompaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks uKnowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
uCompaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks uKnowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
uCompaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks uKnowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
uCompaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks uKnowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
|
The quality of a rock as a petroleum reservoir is strongly affected by the post-depositional (diagenetic) processes that modify the original porosity and permeability of the sediments. Petrographic analysis allows the capture of relevant aspects for determining the depositional and diagenetic history and for understanding how the sequence of processes has affected reservoir quality. Petrographic descriptions provide fundamental information for petroleum exploration and production.
In the last years we have developed a software suite named Petroledge® that allows the acquisition and management of detailed petrographic information of siliciclastic and carbonate reservoir rocks. Petrographic information is selected and modelled based on visual features recognized during description, to which Petroledge® provides a symbolic representation, formalizing the whole vocabulary of petrographic description in a domain ontology. With this information, and based on artificial intelligence methods, Petroledge® performs diagenetic interpretations that help in the characterization and prediction of reservoir quality (De Ros, Goldberg et al., 2007).
In this paper, we explain how the Petroledge® suite was improved in order to provide the evaluation of compaction degree of reservoirs by using optical photomicrographs and inference methods. In order to reproduce the geological visual interpretation as it is done in petrographic analysis, we developed a hybrid method that combines image-processing algorithms with knowledge representation models and reasoning methods. The method was proposed inspired on the human brain mechanism of dealing with visual information. Visual attention (Meur e Al., 2006) is the mechanism that allows the brain to filter the huge amount of information that comes through the eyes and to select the relevant elements to be further analysed by the highly abstract level of reasoning. The process involves the decomposition of a scene and the competition among its different aspects, in order to isolate and select the relevant areas of the scene. It is partially a physical process that occurs in the retina and a cognitive process handled by the cerebral cortex.
Compaction Evaluation of Siliciclastic Rocks
The quality of a rock as a petroleum reservoir is essentially defined by its porosity and permeability values. Basically, three diagenetic processes are responsible by the modification of the intergranular volume from clastic rocks during burial: mechanical compaction, chemical compaction and cementation. (Figure 1) The mechanical compaction causes the reduction of the intergranular volume by rearrangement, fracturing or ductile deformation of the grains. Chemical compaction reduces the intergranular volume by dissolving the grains along their contacts. Cementation causes obstruction of the intergranular pores by the precipitation of new minerals, mostly without reducing the intergranular volume. The intensity of mechanical and chemical compaction defines the degree of proximity – or packing – of the grains, which can be loose, normal or tight. As the packing changes from loose to tight, the types of contacts between grains change from point contact, to long, to concaves-convex and to sutured (Taylor, 1950). (Figure 2)
Other method for evaluating the
degree of compaction involves comparing the present intergranular volume
(IGV) with the original IGV, measured using the grain size and selection
(Beard and Weyl 1973). Based on these
Our system performs the evaluation of compaction degree based on the number and types of contacts detected in optical photomicrographs and described by user, as well as on the evaluation of intergranular volume. Table 1 shows examples of inputs and outputs of the system, for two samples with different degree of compaction.
Knowledge Modelling of Visual Aspects
In order to identify evidence for image interpretation in the physical level to be used to support the reasoning process in the knowledge level, we propose a knowledge representation model in three levels of abstraction, summarized in Figure 3. In the first one, the Image Processing Level, we have the basic elements of the image, which are pixels and image entities. (Figure 4) Each image is referenced to a spatial coordinate system that preserves a real correspondence with the rock thin section. The correspondence is controlled by an electromechanical microscope stage (Victoreti, Abel et al., 2007) developed to help in the point-counting for quantitative petrographic analysis. The processing in the lower level starts with the image segmentation using a wavelet (Acharayya, De et al., 2003) that is sensitive to any abrupt change of frequency. The wavelets identify the borders of grains, providing a rough segmentation that needs to be refined manually by the user, especially when the rock texture and fabric are complex. This image processing produces the individualization of the grains in the image that will be analyzed in the next level.
In the Visual Level, we provide representation primitives to be associated to the elements of the image that are separated by visual attention object recognition. (Figure 5) Knowledge acquisition experiments showed that the visual attention system first isolates the objects from the background, mostly based on their colour and shape. In other words, when a petrographer firstly exams a thin-section, his eyes will capture and isolate the borders that separate minerals and pores, and then will focus on the grains. The outlines are essential to separate the grains because petrographic analysis is performed in the two-dimensional universe of thin-sections. The knowledge in this level is modelled in terms of Section (inner part of the grains), Pore (empty spaces in a thin-section), NonPore (e.g. cement, matrix), Outline (borders of grains) and Interstice (higher-level abstraction of pores and non pores). The higher-level object in that level is the Image. The shape of the outlines and the dominance of the impregnation blue resin indicate if it contains a Pore, a NonPore or a Section. The geometry of the connection segments between Sections is used to define the contact types and is further interpreted to define the rock compaction level. The system provides the first identification of objects that are interactively refined by the user when the shape of the grain does not correspond to the expected by the classification rule.
The objects captured and labelled in the visual level are then processed in the Semantic Level, in order to extract the meaning of shapes and contacts for compaction interpretation. The system correlates the captured objects to the concepts defined in the domain ontology on Petrography defined in (Abel, Silva et al., 2005) and implemented in the Petroledge® system. In our ontology, the objects captured by visual attention are associated to Grain, Cement, Pore, Outline and Interstice. The higher level object in that level is the Sample.
A domain ontology is a formal representation of the consensual meaning of the objects in a particular domain (Gómez-Pérez, Fernández-López et al., 2004). Ontologies are being used to define a standard vocabulary and to formalize the shared meaning of it in such a way that it can be understood and applied by computers. Ontologies have been shown a strong approach in representing the knowledge used to support automatic inference processing in expert system or to be shared through the WEB (e.g. to support e-commerce, semantic search based on geological ontologies such as in (Mello, Abel et al., 2007)).
The identities of the objects in each level are guaranteed by mapping tables that associate the primitives of each level of representation, such as, Section in the visual level and Grain in the semantic level. These tables allow recovering the reasoning process by showing how a particular petrographic feature recognized in the thin-section was used to support the inference on degree of compaction.
Our inference mechanism receives the rock image, the segmented image and the size scale. The sections in the segmented image are individualized, and the main shape, concave or convex, is determined. Grains, defined by their convex shapes are identified, and their largest axes are measured. Pores are identified by the blue resin colour. After the physical processing of the image, the elements are associated to the objects in the visual level. In that level, the outlines are analysed in terms of topology and the type and number of contacts are defined. (Figure 6) Currently, the process of contact type definition is manually performed, however an implementation to automatic detect them based on the geometry of outlines at the contacts is under development. The whole set of information are applied to determine the compaction level and the intergranular volume.
The workflow at Figure 7 shows how the data processing is done in our approach, since the rock description using the Petroledge® system until the inference of compaction degree.
The automatic interpretation of visual content is still an area under study that does not offer largely accepted technical solutions due to difficulties to extract meaning from images in different domains. In order to perform automatic image interpretation, it is necessary to provide a symbolic representation of visualized objects, so that this information can be processed. The use of ontologies stands out for that purpose, as they allow visual knowledge representation in a very similar way to human image interpretation process.
We use this approach in order to interpret the level of compaction of petroleum reservoirs, based on photomicrographs collected during petrographic description. Since our approach is based on the shape of the contact between grains, it is not affected by the common deformations of the image caused by optical capture. These deformations, such as the parallax, that augment the area of the grains as far as are the grains from the center of the optical system, invalidate direct measures over the image.
Although the system occasionally requires human intervention in some critical steps, such as to improve the segmentation of the images, it significantly reduces the time of the process applying a low-cost algorithm in terms of processing, while allowing a formalization and implementation of a very subjective method. A formalized interpretation method supports better correlation of the results along with the complex tasks of characterization and prediction of the quality of petroleum reservoirs.
We acknowledge the support of the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) and Agency for Studies and Projects Funding (FINEP).
Abel, M., L.A.L. Silva, J.A. Campbell, and L.F. De Ros, 2005, Knowledge acquisition and interpretation problem-solving methods for visual expertise: a study of petroleum-reservoir evaluation: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, v. 47/1-2, p.51-69.
Acharayya, M., R.K. De, and M.K. Kundu, 2003, Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Images Using Wavelet Features and Their Evaluation in Soft Computing Framework: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, v. 41, p. 2900-2905.
Beard, D.C. and P.K. Weyl, 1973, Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand: AAPG Bulletin, v. 57/2, p. 349-369.
De Ros, L.F., M. Abel, and K. Goldberg, 2007, Advanced Acquisition and Management of Petrographic Information from Reservoir Rocks Using the PETROLEDGE®System: AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition. Long Beach, CA. Search and Discovery Article #90063 (2007). Web accessed 09 Sept 2009.
Gómez-Pérez, A., M. Fernández-López, and O. Corcho, 2004, Ontological Engineering: With examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-commerce and the Semantic Web: Springer, 403 p.
Le Meur, O., Le Callet, P., D. Barba, and D. Thoreau, A coherent computational approach to model bottom-up visual attention: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, v. 28/5, p. 802-817.
Mello, M.T., M. Abel, and F. Garcia-Sanchez, 2007, Using Semantic Web Services to Integrate Data and Processes from Different Web Portals: International Workshop on Intelligent Web Based Tools. Patras, Grecia: CEUR. October 29-31, p. 9-16.
Taylor, J.M., 1950, Pore-space Reduction in Sandstones: AAPG Bulletin, v. 34/4, p.701-716.
Victoreti, F.I., M. Abel, L.F. De Ros, M.M. Oliveira, 2007, Documenting Visual Quality Controls on the Evaluation of Petroleum Reservoir-rocks through Ontology-based Image Annotation, in Theoretical Advances and Applications of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing, v. 42, p.455-464.
|
