[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view presentation in PDF format.

 

Conditioned Forward Previous HitStratigraphicNext Hit Modeling in Large Carbonate Fields: A Dionisos Previous HitModelNext Hit of Karachaganak*

Miriam Andres, Phil Bassant, and Mitch Harris

 

Search and Discovery Article #40352 (2008)

Posted November 20, 2008

 

*Adapted from oral presentation at AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Cape Town, South Africa, October 26-29, 2008.
Click to view list of articles adapted from presentations by P.M. (Mitch) Harris or by his co-workers and him at AAPG meetings from 2000 to 2008.

 

Chevron Energy Technology Company, San Ramon CA ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])

 

Abstract

Karachaganak is a large Devonian to Permian age isolated carbonate retrograde gas-condensate field in Northern Kazakhstan. Here, conspicuous steep (20-30 degrees) high-rise (<400 m) clinoforms are observed yet un-mapped due to poor Previous HitseismicNext Hit expression, and thus not integrated into the conventional geocellular Previous HitmodelNext Hit used for flow simulations. Although sufficiently simulating field-scale behavior and long-term production, this approach inadequately addresses individual well-performance as proportional bedding used in the conventional Previous HitmodelNext Hit construction cross-cuts steeply dipping flow units. Flow-unit orientation is critical as it strongly influences vertical reservoir connectivity, affecting produced-fluid composition which varies vertically in the reservoir. Steeply dipping flow units can also decrease horizontal transmissibility (flow across multiple flow units), leading to lateral variations in pressure which are merely the result of stratigraphy.

To address the above-mentioned challenges, we build a Previous HitmodelNext Hit using ‘Dionisos, a diffusion-based forward Previous HitstratigraphicNext Hit modeling package. Vertical thicknesses are conditioned by stretching the final Previous HitmodelNext Hit to mapped Previous HitseismicNext Hit surfaces. Facies are conditioned manually to interpreted facies maps by interval. Equally, geomorphologic elements of platform-top and slope are conditioned to Previous HitseismicNext Hit observations. Boundary input parameters, such as Previous HitmodelNext Hit age, eustatic sea level, as well as sediment production rates and depths, correspond to the respective geologic age of the reservoir. The resulting S-grid is populated with depositional facies and captures the non-stationary facies patterns currently difficult to achieve with conventional geostatistical simulations. 3D co-rendering of the Dionisos Previous HitmodelNext Hit and Previous HitseismicNext Hit cube has provided a powerful instrument used extensively to re-evaluate the Previous HitseismicNext Hit interpretation. We gained valuable insights in particular where Previous HitmodelNext Hit prediction and Previous HitseismicNext Hit cube disagree and in areas of poor Previous HitseismicNext Hit quality, such as sub-salt environments. Furthermore the Previous HitmodelNext Hit offered alternative scenarios to existing Previous HitseismicNext Hit interpretations.

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFSM

uFSM workflow

uInterrogation summary

uKey results

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFSM

uFSM workflow

uInterrogation summary

uKey results

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFSM

uFSM workflow

uInterrogation summary

uKey results

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFSM

uFSM workflow

uInterrogation summary

uKey results

uReferences

 

Selected Figures

Importance of preserving steep-angled slopes in the Previous HitmodelNext Hit.

Base Previous HitmodelNext Hit inputs.

Previous HitModelNext Hit output: comparison to Previous HitseismicNext Hit and well facies.

Previous HitModelNext Hit output: comparison to well facies.

Slope comparison.

Revised geological Previous HitmodelNext Hit.

Previous HitModelNext Hit improvements: clinoform architecture.

Forward Previous HitStratigraphicNext Hit Modeling (FSM)

  • Numerical simulation of the sedimentological processes that produce stratigraphy.
  • Numerous modeling software packages available; each with a distinct specialty (i.e., time and spatial scale, geologic setting, etc.).

DIONISOS —Diffusive Orientated Normal and Inverse Simulation of Sedimentation (by IFP -- Granjeon, 1997; Granjeon and Joseph, 1999)

  • diffusion-based, multi-lithology, 3D simulator for the use of basin to sub-basin scale over millions of years
  • open structure which can Previous HitmodelNext Hit clastics, carbonates, mixed systems, deep water, slope processes, etc.
  • will not Previous HitmodelNext Hit individual objects (i.e., sand bars).

FSM Workflow

  1. Choosing critical input parameters
      -rate of subsidence -> accommodation space
      -rate of sea level change -> accommodation space
      -sediment production rates -> strata thickness
      -hydrodynamic regime -> sediment distribution
      -Previous HitmodelNext Hit dimensions, time step; Previous HitmodelNext Hit space
      -conditioning of facies and geomorphologic elements
  2. Build initial Previous HitmodelNext Hit and perform sensitivity analysis.
      -identify critical parameters and their effect on Previous HitmodelNext Hit.
  3. Build, interrogate and revise base Previous HitmodelNext Hit.
      -comparison to data (Previous HitseismicNext Hit and facies at wells)
      -Previous HitmodelNext Hit reruns to fine tune facies match

Previous HitModelNext Hit Interrogation Summary

  1. Test the geological validity of the Previous HitmodelNext Hit by comparing with:
    • facies at wells
    • observed Previous HitseismicNext Hit geometries
    • internal consistency check between facies and bedding architecture.
  • overestimation of shallow-water platform
  • significantly more slope facies needed
  • variable clinoform dips
  • in need of alternative progradation style
  1. Decide whether the Previous HitmodelNext Hit is:
    • geologically valid as is,
    • needs updating before use,
    • or belongs in the bin.
  2. Revise base Previous HitmodelNext Hit.

Key Results

Established workflow for ‘conditioned’simulation

  • revised conceptual understanding of reservoir architecture
  • investigated extent of slope versus shallow platform facies
  • improved our understanding of clinoform characteristics
  • reservoir-quality/facies prediction in poorly imaged areas

Common visualization and communication tool.

Selected References

Bassant, Phillip, and Paul M. (Mitch) Harris, 2008, Modeling Reservoir Architecture of Isolated Carbonate Platforms: Search and Discovery Article #40294 (http://searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2008/08070bassant/index.htm).

Bassant, Phillip, and Paul M. (Mitch) Harris, 2008, Analyzing Reservoir Architecture of Isolated Carbonate Platforms: Search and Discovery Article #40295 (2008) (http://searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2008/08071bassant/index.htm).

Granjeon, D., 1997. Modelisation stratigraphique deterministe - conception et applications d'un modele diffusif 3D multilithologique: Memoires Geosciences Rennes, Ph. D. Dissertation, Geosciences Rennes, Rennes, France, 189 p.

Granjeon, D., and Joseph P., 1999, Concepts and applications of a 3D multiple lithology, diffusive Previous HitmodelNext Hit in Previous HitstratigraphicTop modeling, in J.W. Harbaugh et al., eds., Numerical Experiments in Stratigraphy: SEPM Special Publication 62, p. 197-210.

Return to top.