--> 3-D Modelling of Epeiric Carbonate Reservoirs: A Workflow from Outcrop to Streamline Simulation, by Denis Palermo, Thomas Aigner, Sergio Nardon, and Wolfgang Blendinger, #50092 (2008).
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view presentation in PDF format.

Right click to download animation, pseudo layer-cake geometries (11.6mb).

Right click to download animation, permeability (12.3mb).

 

3-D Modelling of Epeiric Carbonate Reservoirs: A Workflow from Outcrop to Streamline Previous HitSimulationNext Hit*

 

Denis Palermo1, Thomas Aigner2, Sergio Nardon1, and Wolfgang Blendinger3

 

Search and Discovery Article #50092 (2008)

Posted October 3, 2008

 

*Adapted from oral presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas, April 20-23, 2008.

1 Sedimentology, Petrography and Stratigraphy, ENI S.p.A. - Exploration& Production Division, San Donato Milanese, Italy ([email protected])

2 Sedimentary Geology, University of Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany

3 Petroleum Geology, Technical University of Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany

 

Abstract 

Within the GECO-project, a joint ENI E&P - University research consortium on the “Geometry of Carbonate Objects,” Triassic epicontinental ramp carbonates in the South-German Basin were studied as an analog to “non reefal” carbonate sand reservoirs of the Middle East. The Previous HitreservoirNext Hit facies consists of skeletal and oolitic carbonate pack- and grainstones (Phi max. 23%, K max 700 mD), organised in a three-fold hierarchy of cycles. The purpose of this Previous HitstudyNext Hit is a detailed analysis of the evolution, anatomy, sedimentology, and petrophysical characteristics of the Previous HitreservoirNext Hit bodies. The database consists of 50 measured sections supplemented by 6 cores and wireline logs as well as 568 poroperm plugs and covers an area at the scale of a giant gas-field (25x36 km). To link the Previous HitstudyNext Hit directly with the subsurface, all data have been compiled in a high-resolution 3D geological Previous HitreservoirNext Hit model, using the software Petrel.

The outcrop analog Previous HitstudyNext Hit demonstrated that the apparently “layer-cake” stratigraphy shows in fact subtle clinoform geometries.

Key factors controlling the Previous HitreservoirNext Hit distribution and properties are:
a) Facies and early diagenesis: Porous facies types are restricted to the high-energy shoal facies.
b) Cyclicity: Volume and dimensions of the Previous HitreservoirNext Hit bodies seem to be mainly controlled by a hierarchy of stratigraphic cycles.
c) Paleorelief: Subtle paleo-highs are important for the spatial distribution of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit facies.

In this particular epeiric setting it proved most useful to use a deterministic facies modeling approach, while for the petrophysical modeling several algorithms conditioned to facies and cyclicity provided reasonable results.

Subsequently, the model was upscaled for flow-Previous HitsimulationNext Hit, with Frontsim using various scenarios. The flow-simulations demonstrated the need for high resolution Previous HitsimulationNext Hit grids in thin-bedded epeiric carbonate reservoirs.

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uConclusions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uConclusions

 

 

 

 

Selected Figures

Location map of Previous HitstudyNext Hit area.

Layer-cake stratigraphy on outcrop scale.

Layer-cake stratigraphy on seismic profile.

Selected facies types.

Cyclicity: large-scale and medium-scale cycles.

Facies control on Previous HitreservoirNext Hit development.

Previous HitReservoirNext Hit controlled by stratigraphic cycles.

Previous HitReservoirNext Hit controlled by paleorelief.

Previous HitReservoirNext Hit controlled by facies.

  

Conclusions

Previous HitReservoirTop controlled by:

  • Stratigraphic cycles
  • Paleorelief
  • Facies

 

Return to top.