Click to view presentation in PDF format.

 

Multiple-Point Statistics (MPS)/Facies Distribution Modeling (FDM) of Carbonates – an Isolated Platform Example*

By

Marjorie Levy1, Paul M. (Mitch) Harris1, and Sebastien Strebelle1

 

Search and Discovery Article #40292 (2008)

Posted July 30, 2008

 

*Adapted from oral presentation at the 2006 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, November 5-8, 2006.

Click to view list of articles adapted from presentations by P.M. (Mitch) Harris or by his co-workers and him at AAPG meetings from 2000 to 2008.

 

1 Chevron Energy Technology Company, San Ramon, California, USA (levm@chevron.com; MitchHarris@chevron.com; stsb@chevron.com)

 

Abstract

We have explored the use of MPS/FDM modeling in a carbonate reservoir. We have modeled the platform top of an isolated platform example and tested various scenarios for the distribution of grainstone facies.

The training image is a 3D conceptual model of the reservoir, containing information about facies dimensions and relationships among facies. Five facies were considered:

The facies probability cube allows controlling the spatial distribution of the facies in the MPS model. First, facies depocenter maps were generated for deeper platform, bar flank, bar crest and island. Then, the stratigraphy of the reservoir was modeled by digitizing a vertical proportion curve reflecting the variations of facies proportions with depth. Three alternative vertical proportion curves were created, representing, respectively:

Corresponding alternative facies probability cubes were generated for these three cases.

Several scenarios were run: the gradual, cyclic, and highly cyclic cases; both narrow and wide bar crests and bar flanks; and with constant and variable azimuth. The wide bar crest/bar flank and very cyclic simulation produce results that qualitatively appear most reasonable in both cross section and map views. Flow simulation of the various models highlights their significant differences.

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase study

uSummary

uReference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase study

uSummary

uReference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase study

uSummary

uReference

 

 

Rationale of Project

  • Focus on isolated carbonate platform example.
  • Use modern analogs for conceptual faciesmodels.
  • Test application of current MPS/FDM tools to carbonate modeling.
  • Develop “new”tools specific for carbonates.

 

Choice of Case Study

  • Build models based on Tengiz reservoir (Weber et al, 2003); not building actual model of reservoir.
  • Model only Bashkirian platform and test varied scenarios for distribution of grainstone facies.

 

Summary of Matches to Real Data

  • Matches facies regions of platform top which were defined during sequence stratigraphy framework development.
  • Matches stratigraphic variation defined during sequence stratigraphy studes with facies proportion curves.
  • Matches conceptual models for facies types from modern analogs with training images.
  • Generally matches facies identified in cored wells.

 

Reference

Weber, L.J., B.P. Francis, P.M. Harris, and M. Clark, 2003, Stratigraphy, lithofacies, and reservoir distribution, Tengiz field, Kazakhstan: Permo-Carboniferous Carbonate Platforms and Reefs, SEPM Special Publication 78, p. 351-394.

 

Return to top.