--> Humma Marrat Reservoir, Partitioned Neutral Zone (PNZ) Case Study – Part 2: Reservoir Evaluation and Optimization
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view page image in pdf format.


AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 90 (2006), Program Abstracts (Digital)

7th Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition
Manama, Bahrain
March 27-29, 2006

ABSTRACT: Humma Marrat Reservoir, Partitioned Neutral Zone (PNZ) Case Study – Part 2: Reservoir Evaluation and Optimization

W. Scott Meddaugh1, W. W. Todd2, Stewart Griest2, Claude Bobien3, and David Barge4
1 Chevron Energy Technology Company, 1500 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002, phone: 832-854-6724, [email protected]
2 Chevron Energy Technology Company, 1500 Louisiana, Houston, 77002
3 Divided Zone Group, Kuwait Oil Company
4 Saudi Arabian Texaco, 1500 Louisiana, Houston, 77002

A design of Previous HitexperimentsNext Hit (DoE) workflow was used to evaluate the Jurassic-age Humma Marrat reservoir in the Partitioned Neutral Zone (PNZ). The Humma Marrat reservoir consists of productive limestone and dolomite intervals separated by very tight limestone and/or shaly limestone zones. The reservoir was discovered in 1998 and produces from five wells. Additional delineation wells were drilled in 2005.

Connectivity and volumetric uncertainties were evaluated using 13 earth models defined by parameter combinations given in a Plackett-Burman design of Previous HitexperimentsNext Hit (DoE) table. The response variable was cumulative oil production through 30 years. Parameters included in the first level DoE analysis were structural uncertainty (seismic interpretation and time -todepth conversion), facies distribution, porosity and Sw histograms, original oil/water contact, porosity semivariogram range, permeability multiplier, fault compartmentalization, and fault transmissibility. Only the porosity histogram emerged as statistically significant.

The second level DoE focused on “traditional” dynamic uncertainty parameters including aquifer support, rock compressibility, heavier oil distribution, kv/kh, PI multiplier, Sorw, and krw@Sorw. An additional uncertainty included in the second level analysis was the extent to which the Humma structure may be open to the south towards the Jauf structure in Saudi Arabia. This was studied using a pore volume multiplier in the the southern-most portion of the Previous HitmodelNext Hit. Only the earth Previous HitmodelNext Hit and PI multiplier uncertainties were statistically significant.

The results of the DoE analysis were used to define the reservoir models for development optimization. The P50 Previous HitmodelTop was used to screen development options that included well spacing, well type, and horizontal well length. Economic analyses were conducted to select the optimum development scenario using the P10, P50, and P90 reservoir models.

 

Copyright © 2006. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All Rights Reserved.