--> Automated Fault Plane and Polygon Generation in a Large, Mixed 2D and 3D Seismic Data Set
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view page image in pdf format.


AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 90 (2006), Program Abstracts (Digital)

7th Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition
Manama, Bahrain
March 27-29, 2006

ABSTRACT: Automated Fault Plane and Polygon Generation in a Large, Mixed 2D and 3D Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Previous HitDataNext Hit Set

Michael G. Kumpas1, Srinivasa Rao Narhari2, Hanan Al-Owihan3, and Andrew Corley4
1 Exploration Group, Kuwait Oil Company (K.S.C.), POBox 9758, Ahmadi, 61008, Kuwait, phone: +965 3989111 - 72309, fax: +965 3984397, [email protected]
2 Exploration, Kuwait Oil Company, P.O. Box: 9758, Code No. 61008, Ahmadi, KUWAIT, 61008, Kuwait
3 Kuwait Oil Company (K.S.C.)
4 Exploration, Chevron Kuwait, Ahmadi, Kuwait

Automated processes for generating spatially consistent fault planes are available in a 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit environment - but not in 2D.

Automation of this process in a mixed 2D and 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit environment was achieved by applying existing Landmark technology so that it became possible to simultaneously process some 450 assigned faults and 14 horizons interpreted on mixed 2D and 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit.

The maximum spatial extent of the 2D and 3D Previous HitdataNext Hit sets was used to define a conventional 3D volume. Interpreted horizons were imported into the empty 3D volume from respective original projects regardless of their 2D or 3D origin. Horizon interpolation ensured seamless horizons between 2D and 3D Previous HitdataNext Hit. Correlated and assigned fault segments were imported in an identical manner.

All Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit are thus defined by spatial coordinates in a common 3D Previous HitdataNext Hit volume and can be processed using 3D applications.

All fault segments are ‘Re-Ribbed' in the 3D domain. ‘Re-Ribbing' is run in both x and y directions separately to account for faults sub-parallel to either ribbing direction. ‘Re-Ribbed' fault segments and Previous HitseismicNext Hit horizons are processed in ‘Surface Tool' to calculate fault heaves and polygons.

Fault polygons are generated for all selected horizons maintaining fault plane integrity and polygon consistency among horizons. Conventional gridding and contouring of interpreted horizons is performed incorporating fault polygons. The method is an efficient tool that can be applied to any 2D / 2D-3D Previous HitdataTop for quick and accurate fault mapping across numerous horizons, without compromising fault plane integrity.

 

Copyright © 2006. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All Rights Reserved.