--> Phase and Polarity Issues in Modern Seismic Interpretation
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view page image in pdf format.


AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 90 (2006), Program Abstracts (Digital)

7th Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition
Manama, Bahrain
March 27-29, 2006

ABSTRACT: Phase and Polarity Issues in Modern Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Previous HitInterpretationNext Hit

Alistair R. Brown
Consulting Reservoir Geophysicist, 1911 Country Brook Lane, Allen, TX 75002, phone: +1-214-544-7183, fax: +1-214-544-0452, [email protected]

Zero phase is the objective of almost all Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit processing today and its interpretive benefits are well known. However it is difficult to achieve. No more than 50% of Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit achieves zero phase sufficiently closely for its benefits and accuracy to be properly enjoyed. Furthermore 90 degree phase is a remarkably common accident and, if not identified, can cause havoc to detailed Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit.

All interpreters should know how to visually assess the phase and polarity of their Previous HitdataNext Hit. I regularly meet those who discover late in the Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit that the Previous HitdataNext Hit has a different phase or opposite polarity to what was first thought. In this paper recommendations for phase and polarity assessment will be made, and several phase circles will be presented.

For zero phase Previous HitdataNext Hit time and amplitude are colocated, and many interpretive procedures on modern workstations are based on this fact. For other phases complications arise, because time and amplitude are in different locations. Suggestions will be offered for handling the all-too-common 90 degree phase Previous HitdataTop.

 

Copyright © 2006. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All Rights Reserved.