--> An Integrated Approach to 3-D Seismic and Electromagnetic Interpretation for Reducing Risks in Hydrocarbon Exploration, by Mikhail Boulaenko, Roy Davies, Jonny Hesthammer, and John Howell; #90052 (2006)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

An Integrated Approach to 3-D Previous HitSeismicNext Hit and Electromagnetic Previous HitInterpretationNext Hit for Reducing Risks in Hydrocarbon Exploration

Mikhail Boulaenko, Roy Davies, Jonny Hesthammer, and John Howell
University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Hydrocarbon exploration is a challenging and expensive business. The chances of discovering producible reserves using conventional methods such as 2D and 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit are relatively slim – less than 20%, on the whole. This is partly due to the fact that gas-saturation levels as low as 5–10% can produce Previous HitseismicNext Hit features such as bright spots and flat spots.

Recent developments in electromagnetic imaging (EM) technology have shown the potential to increase the chances of success by providing a means of identifying hydrocarbon and water filled reservoirs prior to drilling wells. However, there are still many challenges related to optimized use of the technology, including integration with Previous HitseismicNext Hit and well Previous HitdataNext Hit, use in production, and differentiating between the responses of hydrocarbon reservoirs and other resistive bodies such as carbonates and salt.

In this paper we present an integrated workflow for Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit of 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit and EM Previous HitdataNext Hit using examples from real fields and forward-modelled synthetic studies. Advanced inversion algorithms were used to process Previous HitdataNext Hit collected by towing an electromagnetic source over lines of sea bed receivers in order to produce 2D and 3D “resistivity maps” of the subsurface. These were then combined with 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit in order to understand the sources of resistive anomalies. This has important implications for predicting the location and volume of potential hydrocarbon reservoirs. Where the Previous HitseismicTop character of anomalies indicates that they are caused by salt or shallow gas pockets, further “joint inversion” can be run in order to remove them from the processing results.