A Skeptic’s Conclusion:
The Model-based Clastic Sequence Stratigraphic Paradigm Was and Is Fatally Flawed.*
By
William E. Galloway1
Search and Discovery Article #70020 (2006)
Posted August 4, 2006
*Oral presentation at AAPG-SEPM Annual Convention, Houston, Texas, April 9-12, 2006. SEPM Forum: High-Resolution sequence stratigraphy: Is the Model Breaking Apart
Click to view presentation in PDF format.
1University of Texas, Austin, Texas ([email protected])
Limitations of a Model-Based Sequence Paradigm
-
A “sequence boundary” is a conceptual surface that is a composite of multiple physical stratigraphic surfaces.
-
The composite fluvial incision surface is demonstrably not a single, regionally isochronous boundary.
-
Basin
paleogeography
is a 3D mosaic of sediment dispersal systems that cannot be captured by 2D models.
-
Corollary: Clastic sediment supply rate and texture are not uniquely predictable by base level change history.
-
The sequence model and terminology inadequately reflects the diversity of slope and basin facies.
|
Three Types of Stratigraphic Surfaces Physical Surfaces
Geometric Surfaces
Conceptual Surfaces
Physical Stratigraphic SurfacesFluvial entrenchment surface
Regressive ravinement surface
Transgressive ravinement surface
Shelf/slope starvation surface
Shelf erosion (“deflation”) surface
Slope entrenchment surface
Geometric SurfacesDownlap surface Onlap surface Toplap surface
Etc.
Conceptual stratigraphic surfaces(see Figure 1) Correlative conformity
Maximum flooding surface
Sequence boundary
Pliocene Globoquadrina altispira Deposode (Figure 2) WRLU System
Mississippi/Red River System
Features Associated with Deepwater Megaslide
The Good Bits
ReferenceOtvos, E.G., 2005, Chronology of Gulf coastal plain and valley terrace aggradation during Pleistocene lowstands. Limitations of base level control: Quaternary International, v. 135, p. 91-113.
-------------------------------------- Note: concerning SEPM Forum: SEPM Forum: High-Resolution sequence stratigraphy: Is the Model Breaking Apart?
The
objective of this forum was to have an open debate about the
controversies associated with sequence stratigraphic interpretation in
high resolution data sets. Several researchers are puzzled with
questions arising from interpretation in high resolution surveys. What
is the relationship between sea level and systems tracts during the last
glacial cycle? Are the sequence stratigraphic surfaces in fact time
transgressive? What surfaces are more likely to be synchronous? What are
the implications for reservoir correlation and
|