--> Abstract: Analogue Models of Basin Inversion by Transpression: Role of Structural Heterogeneity, by William Sassi, Jean-Paul Callot, Luca Mattioni, and Narjes Kallel; #90039 (2005)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Analogue Models of Basin Inversion by Transpression: Role of Structural Heterogeneity

William Sassi, Jean-Paul Callot, Luca Mattioni, and Narjes Kallel
Institut Français du Pétrole, Rueil Malmaison, France

The process of Previous HitfaultNext Hit generation and reactivation within a crustal-scale rift basin inverted by transpression is studied in a series of analogue experiments using sand and silicone. Each structural scenario is a three steps story with first extension of a sandpack resting above a basal silicone layer, then sedimentation with silicone and sand layers, and lastly transpression. The interbedded silicone layer introduces a potential décollement between the pre- and the post-rift sediments. After sedimentation, deformation by transpression was applied for different velocity vectors, with progressive increase of shearing. The occurrence of pre-existing grabens leads in general to a two phases structure generation during transpression: (1) creation of reverse faults parallel to the rift-bounding faults; (2) reactivation of old thrust as sinistral oblique slip structures at more advanced stages of deformation. Strike-slip faults develop at more advanced stages of transpression, with an orientation that is consistent with the far field applied strain. The general sequence of Previous HitfaultNext Hit generation and reactivation suggests a temporal change in the stress Previous HitregimeNext Hit which may result from the permutation of the minimum and the intermediate principal stress axes as well as from a progressive rotation of the axis of the maximum compressive stress. The last parameter that influence the stress Previous HitregimeNext Hit partitioning is the topography of the interbedded ductile layer, which introduces a mechanical decoupling between the post rift cover and the stretched basin. In summary, this work suggests that, when a pre-existing graben is present, there is in time a succession of two distinct "tectonic phases", whereas without any rift, the resulting Previous HitfaultNext Hit pattern correspond to a single stress Previous HitregimeTop and tectonic phase. A comparison with the modelling of a natural example of forced fold (Split Mountain, Utah) will be proposed.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90039©2005 AAPG Calgary, Alberta, June 16-19, 2005