Abstract: Visualisation with Quantification: New Approaches to Reservoir Petrophysics
Paul B. Basan, Ben D. Lowden, John J. Attard
Quantifying variations in the pore
structure that regulates flow leads to a better understanding of reservoir quality. Mercury injection (MICP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and backscattered electron image analysis (BSEI) offer the visual depiction and the quantitative data needed to characterize
pore
systems
. More important, each technique characterizes the
pore
system differently, and together furnishes a way to diagnose variations and calculate reservoir properties.
Porosity and permeability correlations reveal variations in the efficiency of pore
structures to transmit fluid. MICP, NMR and BSEI distributions show the same variations in efficiency. However, NMR and MICP measure
pore
sizes connected to the total volume of the
pore
system, which include some non-hydraulic pores. BSEI measures the larger parts of
pore
channels, and therefore focuses on
pore
sizes associated with a "restricted" volume. Differences in these measurements identify the
pore
size and volume that contribute to permeability.
Calculating permeability based on a critical pore
size and the
pore
volume it connects produce equations in the form of C(
pore
size2 × porosity). Here
pore
size squared comes from NMR, MICP or BSEI, and gives the equation the dimensions of permeability. Total porosity raised to the exponent "n" is the adjusted
pore
volume associated with the critical
pore
size.
Using the visual and quantitative information from these different measurements, on a large database, shows that the constant is reservoir-specific, whereas the exponent is geometry-specific. Changes in the constant and exponent expose variations in reservoir quality that have important applications in formation evaluation.
AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90951©1996 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Caracas, Venezuela